Editorial – What’s in a Name?
After finishing Mass Effect 3 today something popped in my head. What exactly is in a name, or a brand? Lately I’ve been thinking more and more about Nintendo’s current branding strategy. Before we jump into Nintendo, let’s look at Apple’s strategy. Ever since the introduction of the iMac Apple has slowly molded their entire line of software (iTunes to iOS) and hardware (iMac, iPod, iPhone, and iPad) to reflect the “i.” It now appears that Nintendo wants to do the same thing, except separate their portable line into “DS” and their console line into “Wii.”
This is nothing new, the company has kept the “Nintendo” brand for many years. First there was the Nintendo Entertainment System, which everyone referred to as the NES. Then there was the SNES, a direct continuation of the brand, before moving on to the N64, yet another continuation. They mixed things up for the first time with the GameCube, but technically it was the Nintendo GameCube, although the Nintendo moniker was much less pronounced. Then the Wii hit the scene and everything changed.
It wasn’t just their console line that kept the same strong brand. Nintendo’s portable line of systems used the Game Boy brand for almost 20 years. From 1989’s original Game Boy to 2005’s Game Boy Micro. The company took a real risk in changing the brand of both their portable and home console brand to something else, as is always the case when brands are so identifiable. With the release of the DS, and Wii, Nintendo hit international gold. Both platforms exploded into the marketplace and it’s only natural Nintendo would want to keep their branding moving forward. They’d be foolish not to right?
After thinking about this for a while I’m no longer convinced this is the right course of action for the Wii brand. Let’s back peddle a bit before moving on. You can’t really confuse an iPhone for an iPad, and yet both are clearly made by the same company and feature the same branding. With the DS and Wii though it’s not quite as simple. Initially many parents thought the 3DS and DS were one and the same, with the 3DS being possibly another remodel to the existing DS much like the DS Lite was. The names were just a bit too close. People didn’t have that problem when moving from the Game Boy to the Game Boy Color. Nintendo themselves must realize the exact same thing will happen with the Wii U. Anyone remember the system’s official unveiling last year? Oh that’s right, the system never had an official unveiling. I watched the conference and was so confused because I thought their next platform was either a peripheral for the Wii or a new handheld device. It was only after the conference did we learn that no, there’s a new box to purchase as well. So that single letter does make a difference after all. So I ask again, what’s in a name? The answer is, everything. A strong brand can change a company’s fortunes. While Nintendo has been smart to try and keep the branding of the DS, I’m not sure they should do the same for the Wii, and here’s why. A brand tells people right away what they’re getting. If I go to the store and see an i-device I know I’m getting a quality product from Apple, if I go into McDonalds I know I’m getting a Mc-something or other that just might have some Soylent Green in there. These are all names people associate with certain products and or services.
The Wii brand is associated with casual gaming and motion controls. It’s also unfortunately associated with gimmicks and shovel-ware. When Nintendo first announced the Wii U they specifically said it’s not only about everyone, it’s also about you, referring to the core gamer. So does it really make sense to keep the Wii brand if you’re trying to attract an entirely different kind of user? If anything the name might put off hardcore gamers who don’t really pay attention to gaming sites, because they’ll walk into a store and see the Wii U sitting there and say to themselves “oh just another motion system for grandma.” Would they be wrong to think so either? Not really. After all, this generation’s hardcore gamers all but ignored the Wii, so why wouldn’t these people think the exact same thing about the Wii U? Even those that did initially enjoy the platform have given up on it earlier than Nintendo anticipated. So will these people really want to invest in a brand that essentially means fun for a while, but doesn’t have a wide assortment of hardcore games I enjoy and will be replaced before my other consoles?
This is just one brief example to show the power of a brand, and it’s one of the reasons Microsoft and Sony have kept their brands for so long. Don’t think the next Microsoft system won’t use the Xbox name because it will. Everyone saying Sony is moving away from the PlayStation name is crazy. The company spent billions establishing that brand; they will not stop using it no matter what. They simply might not call their next console the PS4, but it will be PlayStation something. So what do you all think? Should Nintendo keep the Wii brand, or move on to usher in a new era of hardcore and casual gaming? I think the answer is clear, if you’re trying to attract a new type of gamer, you don’t want to associate yourself with a brand that attracted tens of millions of casuals, do you?
- The Current State of Portable Game Sales
- The Incredible Return of Lara Croft
- What Will It Take For You To Buy An Xbox One?
- Animal Crossing: New Leaf Review
- The Legend of Zelda: Symphony of the Goddesses Review
- Sony’s PS4 Taking a Commanding Pre-Order Lead
- The Strange Appeal of Animal Crossing: New Leaf (Warning: Adult Content…Sort Of)
- Canadian Gamers – Episode 34
- E3 2013 – Canadian Gamers – Episode 33
- The Ultimate Top 5 Vita Games of All Time List