<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First-Party Wii U Launch Windows Titles Confirmed Offline Only</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectcoe.com/2012/09/20/first-party-wii-u-launch-windows-titles-confirmed-offline-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectcoe.com/2012/09/20/first-party-wii-u-launch-windows-titles-confirmed-offline-only/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrod Nichol</title>
		<link>http://www.projectcoe.com/2012/09/20/first-party-wii-u-launch-windows-titles-confirmed-offline-only/#comment-148946</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrod Nichol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectcoe.com/?p=17342#comment-148946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still find it a downer, like I wrote above.  I mean sure we know from a technical standpoint Nintendo knows how to provide an online service, and if they don&#039;t they can easily afford to find someone who does.  It&#039;s the corporate attitude that worries me.  Sega started making inroads in the online space with the Saturn back in late 1996 (!)  From there the company evolved the idea to SegaNet in 2000 with the Dreamcast.  It took about a year or so, but eventually they started releasing online content in virtually every game they produced.  From sports games featuring online multiplayer to an MMO itself, they continued to push online content while concurrently keeping local multiplayer alive and well.  To this day I still say Sega was the only console maker to understand and &quot;get&quot; online, because they made it part of their identity.  Everyone else tried to do away with local multiplayer as time went on. 

Microsoft took what Sega did and evolved on it ten fold, and we sort of know how everything else turned out.  With Nintendo though I always feel like the company just doesn&#039;t understand the potential for greatness.  This was the company that first introduced a system with four controller ports because of the multiplayer experience, and yet doesn&#039;t feel the need to stretch that out on a global scale.  Sure we get SSB, Mario Kart and a few others that the media would destroy if they didn&#039;t have some sort of online multiplayer, but as a whole I just don&#039;t think Nintendo sees the big picture, and that&#039;s a real shame.  I honestly think Nintendo could do some truly wonderful stuff in the online space if they only took it series.  We are now 2012, an incredible 16 years after Sega launched the ill-fated NetLink adapter for the Sega Saturn and there will be a new console arriving without first-party online multiplayer support.  I truly never imagined that would happen.  I thought for certain that online multiplayer would co-exist with local multiplayer starting with the Dreamcast, PS2, GameCube and Xbox generation, but obviously that&#039;s simply not the case.  

Hopefully that puts things into perspective a bit.  Am I not going to purchase the system now, no of course not, but it certainly seems to me that Nintendo might never fully come to terms with online multiplayer if they have pretty much ignored it for the past two generations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still find it a downer, like I wrote above.  I mean sure we know from a technical standpoint Nintendo knows how to provide an online service, and if they don&#8217;t they can easily afford to find someone who does.  It&#8217;s the corporate attitude that worries me.  Sega started making inroads in the online space with the Saturn back in late 1996 (!)  From there the company evolved the idea to SegaNet in 2000 with the Dreamcast.  It took about a year or so, but eventually they started releasing online content in virtually every game they produced.  From sports games featuring online multiplayer to an MMO itself, they continued to push online content while concurrently keeping local multiplayer alive and well.  To this day I still say Sega was the only console maker to understand and &#8220;get&#8221; online, because they made it part of their identity.  Everyone else tried to do away with local multiplayer as time went on. </p>
<p>Microsoft took what Sega did and evolved on it ten fold, and we sort of know how everything else turned out.  With Nintendo though I always feel like the company just doesn&#8217;t understand the potential for greatness.  This was the company that first introduced a system with four controller ports because of the multiplayer experience, and yet doesn&#8217;t feel the need to stretch that out on a global scale.  Sure we get SSB, Mario Kart and a few others that the media would destroy if they didn&#8217;t have some sort of online multiplayer, but as a whole I just don&#8217;t think Nintendo sees the big picture, and that&#8217;s a real shame.  I honestly think Nintendo could do some truly wonderful stuff in the online space if they only took it series.  We are now 2012, an incredible 16 years after Sega launched the ill-fated NetLink adapter for the Sega Saturn and there will be a new console arriving without first-party online multiplayer support.  I truly never imagined that would happen.  I thought for certain that online multiplayer would co-exist with local multiplayer starting with the Dreamcast, PS2, GameCube and Xbox generation, but obviously that&#8217;s simply not the case.  </p>
<p>Hopefully that puts things into perspective a bit.  Am I not going to purchase the system now, no of course not, but it certainly seems to me that Nintendo might never fully come to terms with online multiplayer if they have pretty much ignored it for the past two generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Mosly</title>
		<link>http://www.projectcoe.com/2012/09/20/first-party-wii-u-launch-windows-titles-confirmed-offline-only/#comment-148866</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Mosly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectcoe.com/?p=17342#comment-148866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfectly fine with this. As long as third parties are not restricted from online play, it&#039;s all good as far as I&#039;m concerned. Mario Kart 7 came out of Nintendo, and it has a robust online experience so I know that if they want to focus on that as a developer, they can. It&#039;s not that they unintentionally don&#039;t know online or are being stupid. They&#039;re just stubborn and persistant to show off what they think will add a lot to the online experience: Miiverse. Paving the way as they&#039;ve put it. I&#039;m taking a wait and see approach on this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfectly fine with this. As long as third parties are not restricted from online play, it&#8217;s all good as far as I&#8217;m concerned. Mario Kart 7 came out of Nintendo, and it has a robust online experience so I know that if they want to focus on that as a developer, they can. It&#8217;s not that they unintentionally don&#8217;t know online or are being stupid. They&#8217;re just stubborn and persistant to show off what they think will add a lot to the online experience: Miiverse. Paving the way as they&#8217;ve put it. I&#8217;m taking a wait and see approach on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
